The future of psychotherapy outcome research: Science or political rhetoric?

Journal/Book: J Psychol. 2000; 134: 1319 Eighteenth St NW, Washington, DC 20036-1802, USA. Heldref Publications. 659-669.

Abstract: Although the relationship between research and clinical psychology has at times been conflicted, it has also been productive. Psychologists from both specialties have benefited from each others' work. The area of psychotherapy outcome research represents an important interface between the fields of clinical and research psychology. In an era of scarce resources and demands for accountability, there is pressure for researchers to justify the value of clinical practices. Recently, numerous articles have appeared recommending changes to the way psychotherapy research is conducted. The authors of these articles emphasize with urgency the importance of conducting and reporting research in a manner that will influence the decisions of policymakers and sanction funding for psychotherapy services. This article is an exploration of the impact of these recommendations, whose objective appears to be the promotion of psychological techniques for inclusion in clinical practice guidelines. It is argued that such recommendations may be in conflict with the philosophy and methods of science and may adversely affect public perception, perhaps leading psychologists to be seen as political lobbyists rather than clinicians and researchers.

Note: Article Peebles J, Univ Regina, Dept Psychol, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, CANADA

Keyword(s): psychotherapy research; scientific politics; TRIPARTITE MODEL; CONSUMER-REPORTS; MENTAL-HEALTH; EFFICACY

Zurück | Weiter