A parsimonious theory can account for complex phenomena - A discursive analysis of Edwards and Potter's critique of non-discursive language research

Author(s): Fiedler, K.

Journal/Book: Theor Psychol. 1999; 9: 2455 Teller Rd, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA. Sage Publications Inc. 807-822.

Abstract: A strong case was made by Edwards and Potter (1993) that discourse analysis is superior to alternative approaches to language analysis. In the present article we apply four models of language analysis to Edwards and Potter's paper, including our Linguistic Category Model (LCM) and their Discursive Action Model (DAM), with converging results. It is concluded that a complex phenomenon like real language in social context does not necessarily need models and methods approaching the same level of complexity. A more parsimonious model can be even better suited to the task.

Note: Article Schmid J, Univ Heidelberg, Inst Psychol, Hauptstr 47-51, D-69117 Heidelberg, GERMANY

Keyword(s): attribution; discourse; language; linguistic categories; LINGUISTIC INTERGROUP BIAS; IMPLICIT ATTRIBUTIONS; SOCIAL COGNITION; INFORMATION; CONTEXTS

Zurück | Weiter