Cognitive science and phenomenal consciousness: a dilemma, and how to avoid it |
Author(s):
Journal/Book: Philos Psychol. 1997; 10: PO Box 25, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England OX14 3UE. Carfax Publ Ltd. 269-286.
Abstract: When it comes to applying computational theory to the problem of phenomenal consciousness, cognitive scientists appear to face a dilemma. The only strategy that seems to be available is one that explains consciousness in terms of special hinds of computational processes. But such theories, while they dominate the field, have counter-intuitive consequences; in particular, they force one to accept that phenomenal experience is composed of information processing effects. For cognitive scientists, therefore, it seems to come down to a choice between a counter-intuitive theory or no theory at all. We officer a way out of this dilemma. We argue that the computational theory of mind does not force cognitive scientists to explain consciousness in terms of computational processes, as there is an alternative strategy available: one that focuses on the representational vehicles that encode information in the brain. This alternative approach to consciousness alloys us to do justice to the standard intuitions about phenomenal experience, yet remain within the confines of cognitive science.
Note: Article OBrien G, Univ Adelaide, Dept Philosophy, Adelaide, SA 5005, AUSTRALIA
Keyword(s): CONNECTIONISM; SYSTEMS; VISION
© Top Fit Gesund, 1992-2024. Alle Rechte vorbehalten – Impressum – Datenschutzerklärung