A guide to Wilberland: Some common misunderstandings of the critics of Ken Wilber and his work on transpersonal theory prior to 1995

Journal/Book: J Hum Psychol. 1997; 37: 2455 Teller Rd, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Sage Publications Inc. 30-73.

Abstract: This article substantiates the importance of Ken Wilber and his work on transpersonal theory to the psychology and spirituality of human development over the past 23 years. Wilber and his work, prior to 1995, continue to attract ardent controversy, particularly outside of the field of transpersonal psychology. The focus of this article is directed to the identification of a few common pervasive misunderstandings based on recent critiques from writers in psychology. Although Wilber's critical style is at times unnecessarily arrogant, the evidence indicates that the critics' interpretations are not often substantiated and tend to become explicitly or implicitly polemical. This trend is the opposite effect of Wilber's stated intentions of his unifying spectrum psychology. This article is divided into three parts: First is Wilber's actual intentions; second, his major theses; and third, his critical style, with a number of summary hypotheses provided for further study to explain the conflicts between Wilber and his critics.

Note: Review Fisher RM, Search Fearlessness Res Inst, 924 6TH Ave SW, Calgary, AB T2P 0V5, CANADA

Keyword(s): 2 HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGIES; HUMANIZED NO-SELF; DEVELOPMENTAL SPECTRUM; TRANSCENDENCE; PATTERNS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; WASHBURN

Zurück | Weiter