Death in technological time: Locating the end of meaningful life

Journal/Book: Med Anthropol Q. 1996; 10: 4350 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 640, Arlington, VA 22203. Amer Anthropological Assoc. 575-600.

Abstract: This article demonstrates how debate about technologically manipulated death is elaborated in radically different forms in the scientifically sophisticated spaces of Japan and North America. Using recent historical materials and contemporary medical, philosophical, and media publications, I argue that the institutionalization and legitimization of ''brain death'' as the end of life in North America have been Purified by a dominant discourse in which it is asserted that if certain measurable criteria are fulfilled, an individual can be declared scientifically dead. In Japan, by contrast, death is interpreted primarily as a social and not an individual event, and efforts to scientifically define the end of life as a measurable point in time are rejected outright by the majority, including many clinicians. The margins between nature and culture are debated in both cultural spaces, bur assigned different moral status in the respective dominant discourses.

Note: Article Lock M, Mcgill Univ, Dept Social Studies Med, 3655 Drummond St, Montreal, PQ H3G 1Y6, CANADA

Keyword(s): death; technology; brain death; cyborg; North America; Japan; VEGETATIVE STATE; BRAIN-DEATH; DEFINITION

Zurück | Weiter