Possible confounding effects of strobe ''clicks'' on flash evoked potentials in rats

Author(s): Vo, K. T., King, D., Boyes, W. K.

Journal/Book: Physiol Behav. 1996; 59: The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, England OX5 1GB. Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd. 325-340.

Abstract: Flash evoked potentials (FEPs) undergo within- and between-session changes and are modified by auditory white noise (26). We examined whether an auditory potential produced by the ''click'' associated with the strobe discharge could be recorded, and if alterations in an auditory response could explain the within- and between-session changes in FEPs. We also examined differences between a frontal cortex or a nasal reference electrode location on FEPs and auditory potentials. An auditory potential associated with the strobe discharge could be clearly recorded. This response was eliminated by the presence of 80 dB SPL masking white noise. However, the within- and between-session changes in FEPs could not be explained by modifications of the auditory potential. Animals whose ear drums were ruptured did not exhibit an auditory response, and their FEPs were similar to those of controls tested in the presence of masking white noise; A nasal reference electrode decreased the impact of auditory potentials on FEPs, but may allow visual potentials (electroretinogram and optic tract activity) to influence FEPs. The data show that auditory potentials associated with the strobe discharge can be recorded from the visual cortex of rats, and that these auditory responses represent a possible confounding factor in the interpretation of toxicological studies employing FEPs.

Note: Article DW Herr, US EPA, Nptb, NTD, Nheerl, MD-74B, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA

Keyword(s): FEPs; flash evoked potential; strobe click; auditory potential; PATTERN-REVERSAL; NEUROTOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH; VISUAL-SYSTEM; PEAK N160; VEP; AMPLITUDE; TEMPERATURE; STIMULATION; RESPONSES

Zurück | Weiter