The reliability of ABR recordings in children with learning disabilities (sensory integration disorders)

Author(s): Axmann, D.

Journal/Book: Laryngo Rhino Otol. 1995; 74: P O Box 30 11 20, D-70451 Stuttgart, Germany. Georg Thieme Verlag. 539-542.

Abstract: Diagnostic audiological tests performed in ten children from 1985 to 1991 showed remarkable differences between the results of behavioral audiometry (free field or pure tone audiometry) and those of auditory evoked response audiometry. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) was absent in seven children with sensory neural hearing loss. Neuropsychological evaluation was performed on four children, neuropsychological observation was performed on two children, pediatric examination was performed on three children and one child showed signs of neuropediatric disorder. The results of neuropsychological evaluation showed moderate to severe learning disabilities (sensory integration disorders, learning disorders) in all four children tested. Available neuropsychological observation also indicated the presence of sensory integration disorders in two children. Two children had multiple handicaps with cerebral abnormalities, two further children were diagnosed as suffering from ''minimal cerebral dysfunction,'' one of which was mentally retarded. The fact that ABRs were absent in seven children indicates that a response desynchronisation in the auditory pathway may exist in these disorders. Thus, ABR might not be a reliable method for audiological testing in children with learning disabilities or other cerebral dysfunctions, but serves as an adjunct to conventional testing methods.

Note: Article C Vondeuster, Univ Wurzburg, Hals Nasen Ohren Klin, Phoniatrie & Padaudiol ABT, Josef Schneider Str 11, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany

Keyword(s): auditory brainstem response audiometry; learning disability; sensory integration disorder; learning disorder

Zurück | Weiter