Comparison of perioperative myocardial protection with nifedipine versus nifedipine and metoprolol in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting

Author(s): Schwarzacher, S., Zwoelfer, W., Binder, T. M., Wolner, E., Seitelberger, R.

Journal/Book: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 110: 11830 Westline Industrial Dr, St Louis, MO 63146-3318. Mosby-Year Book Inc. 1461-1469.

Abstract: A randomized study was performed on 70 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass grafting to examine whether the combined infusion of the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (10 mu g/kg per hour) and the beta(1)-blocker metopropol (12 mu g/kg per hour, n = 34) reduces the prevalence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and arrhythmia, The control group received nifedipine alone (n = 36), In both groups the infusion was started from the onset of extracorporal circulation and maintained over a period of 24 hours, Repeated 12-lead electrocardiographic and 3-channel Holter monitor recordings for 48 hours were used to define perioperative myocardial ischemia (transient ischemic event, myocardial infarction) and arrhythmias (sinus tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter/fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia), Hemodynamic parameters were repeatedly assessed for 24 hours and serum enzyme levels (creatine kinase, MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase) for up to 36 hours after the operation, The two groups did not differ significantly,vith respect to preoperative anamnestic and surgical data, No signs of perioperative myocardial infarction were detected in either group. However, a significantly lower incidence of transient ischemic episodes was observed in the nifedipine-metoprolol group than in the nifedipine group (3% vs 11%; p < 0.05), In addition, there was a tendency toward lower creatine kinase MB levels and peak values of creatine kinase and creatine kinase MB in the nifedipine-metoprolol group. With regard to perioperative arrhythmias, there was a significantly lower incidence of sinus tachycardia and atrial flutter/fibrillation in the nifedipine-metoprolol group (9% and 6%) than in the nifedipine group (33% and 27%, p < 0.05), In addition, postoperative heart rate was lower in the nifedipine-metoprolol group starting from the sixth hour after release of the aortic crossclamp (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). No other hemodynamic parameters showed significant differences between the two groups and all returned to preoperative levels within 24 hours, In conclusion, perioperative application of nifedipine and metoprolol in patients undergoing elective coronary bypass grafting reduces the prevalence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias without significant negative inotropic effects. The combined infusion of the two drugs appears superior to nifedipine alone in preventing perioperative myocardial ischemia and reducing reperfusion-induced arrhythmias.

Note: Article BK Podesser, Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, E20W, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Keyword(s): VASODILATOR RESERVE; CONSCIOUS DOGS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ISCHEMIA; EFFICACY; CARDIOPLEGIA; EXERCISE; INTRACORONARY; ANGIOPLASTY; INFARCTION

Zurück | Weiter