A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli

Author(s): Hawkins, D. B.

Journal/Book: Ear Hear. 1992; 13: 331-9.

Abstract: Fifteen adults with bilaterally symmetrical mild and/or moderate sensorineural hearing loss completed a paired-comparison task designed to elicit sound quality preference judgments for monaural/binaural hearing aid processed signals. Three stimuli (speech-in-quiet, speech-in-noise, and music) were recorded separately in three listening environments (audiometric test booth, living room, and a music/lecture hall) through hearing aids placed on a Knowles Electronics Manikin for Acoustics Research. Judgments were made on eight separate sound quality dimensions (brightness, clarity, fullness, loudness, nearness, overall impression, smoothness, and spaciousness) for each of the three stimuli in three listening environments. Results revealed a distinct binaural preference for all eight sound quality dimensions independent of listening environment. Binaural preferences were strongest for overall impression, fullness, and spaciousness. Stimulus type effect was significant only for fullness and spaciousness, where binaural preferences were strongest for speech-in-quiet. After binaural preference data were obtained, subjects ranked each sound quality dimension with respect to its importance for binaural listening relative to monaural. Clarity was ranked highest in importance and brightness was ranked least important. The key to demonstration of improved binaural hearing aid sound quality may be the use of a paired-comparison format.

Keyword(s): Acoustics ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Pure Tone; Auditory Perception; Ear physiopathology; Equipment Design; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural rehabilitation; Middle Age; Music ; Noise Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural physiopathology; Speech Perception Comparative Study; Female; Human; Male

Zurück | Weiter