Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Mar; 31(2): 71-83.

Odontogenic myxomas in the Hong Kong Chinese: clinico-radiological presentation and systematic review.

MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Yeung R, Lee KM, Li TK.

Department of Oral Radiology, Dental School, University of Bergen, Norway. David.MacDonald@odont.uib.no

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological presentation on plain films of central odontogenic myxomas (OM) in the Hong Kong Chinese and compare them to other reported series by a systematic review (SR). METHODS: The study had two elements, that of a complete series of all OMs presenting at a major Chinese maxillofacial surgical unit and a SR. The files of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Hong Kong between 1989 and 2000 were reviewed for OM cases. The relevant literature was identified by electronic databases, review of citation lists and handsearching of key journals. The principal selection criterion was that the study should represent a complete collection of cases. RESULTS: The SR revealed that only a quarter of the reports provided any quantitative radiological details. Just under half of the included reports provided the relative period prevalence of OMs compared to other odontogenic tumours, but these reports almost completely excluded consideration not only of the radiology but also specific clinical details. Furthermore, they did not report of recurrence data, an important feature of the OM. Most of the most recent reports were concerned with relative period prevalence. The relative period prevalence and 'number of OMs per hospital per year' of studies separated by two or more decades in Hong Kong and Nigeria indicate an increase in the number of lesions diagnosed as OMs. The 10 Hong Kong cases were broadly consistent with the predilections for females and the mandible of other reports. The mean age at first presentation in the present report is 36.9, older than the other reports. Most lesions are large, affecting both posterior and anterior quadrants. They appear to be larger than those in many other reports. Two of the OMs are accompanied by histories of recent rapid growth. Tooth displacement and root resorption are more frequently observed in OMs in the present study. Although all OMs in the present study are still being followed up after surgery, none have recurred. CONCLUSION: Although the presentation of larger lesions in the older Chinese could in part be explained by attitudes rooted in traditional medicine in spite of the widespread availability of modern medical care in Hong Kong, there is a history of recent rapid growth in at least two cases. An emphasis by recent reports on the OMs' relative period prevalence of concurrent odontogenic lesions, has omitted recording the radiology and the specific clinical details usually required for diagnosis.,