J Altern Complement Med. 2001 Feb; 7(1): 65-78; discussion 79-82.

A case study of misrepresentation of the scientific literature: recent reviews of chiropractic.

Morley J, Rosner AL, Redwood D.

Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, Brookline, MA 02446-3202, USA. joemorley2@thefreeinternet.co.uk

Accurate use of published data and references is a cornerstone of the peer-review process. Statements, inferences, and conclusions based upon these references should logically ensue from the data they contain. When journal articles and textbook chapters summarizing the safety and efficacy of particular therapies or interventions use references inaccurately or with apparent intent to mislead, the integrity of scientific reporting is fundamentally compromised. Ernst et al.'s publication on chiropractic include repeated misuse of references, misleading statements, highly selective use of certain published papers, failure to refer to relevant literature, inaccurate reporting of the contents of published work, and errors in citation. Meticulous analysis of some influential negative reviews has been carried out to determine the objectivity of the data reported. The misrepresentation that became evident deserves full debate and raises serious questions about the integrity of the peer-review process and the nature of academic misconduct.