Myths of neuropsychology

Journal/Book: Clin Neuropsychol. 1997; 11: P O Box 825, 2160 Sz Lisse, Netherlands. Swets Zeitlinger Publishers. 1-17.

Abstract: Progress in clinical neuropsychology is being made, but not at the rate that is found in the other clinical neurosciences. One reason for this is the unquestioned acceptance of erroneous beliefs by neuropsychologists. These beliefs include the following: (1) we know what our tests measure; (2) we have tests specifically sensitive to frontal lobe functioning; (3) patient self-report is reliable in indicating probable cognitive status and cognitive change; (4) above-average performances on neuropsychological tests are expected when intellectual abilities are above average; (5) most clinical neuropsychologists are unable to do research due to a lack of time; and (6) relationships with other neuropsychologists are of little importance. In each case, evidence is presented to show that these are erroneous beliefs that are limiting progress in our field.

Note: Article Dodrill CB, Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Reg Epilepsy Ctr, Box 359745, Seattle,WA 98104 USA

Keyword(s): CARD SORTING TEST; TEST-PERFORMANCE; MEMORY PERFORMANCE; SELF-REPORT; COMPLAINTS; EPILEPSY; BATTERY; INJURY

Zurück | Weiter