What is inhibited in inhibition of return?

Author(s): Jha, A. P., Rosenquist, J. N.

Journal/Book: J Exp Psychol-Hum Percep Perf. 1996; 22: 750 First St NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Amer Psychological Assoc. 367-378.

Abstract: Research on temporal-order judgments, reference frames, discrimination tasks, and links to oculomotor control suggest important differences between inhibition of return (IOR) and attentional costs and benefits. Yet, it is generally assumed that IOR is an attentional effect even though there is little supporting evidence. The authors evaluated this assumption by examining how several factors that are known to influence attentional costs and benefits affect the magnitude of IOR: target modality, target intensity, and response mode. Results similar to those previously reported for attention were observed: IOR was greater for visual than for auditory targets, showed an inverse relationship with target intensity, and was equivalent for manual and saccadic responses. Important parallels between IOR and attentional costs and benefits are indicated, suggesting that, like attention, IOR may in part affect sensory-perceptual processes.

Note: Article PA Reuterlorenz, Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, 525 E Univ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

Keyword(s): SPATIAL ATTENTIONAL SHIFTS; POLYSENSORY MECHANISMS; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SACCADIC LATENCY; FIXATION-POINT; CUE; EXPECTANCIES; LUMINANCE; TARGETS; TIME

Zurück | Weiter