Is disease a natural kind?

Journal/Book: J Med Phil. 1995; 20: Spuiboulevard 50, PO Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publ. 551-569.

Abstract: In The Nature of Disease, Lawrie Reznek argues that disease is not a natural kind term. I raise objections to Reznek's two central arguments for establishing that disease is not a natural kind. In criticizing his a priori, conceptual argument against naturalism, I argue that his conclusion rests on a weaker argument that appeals to the empirical diversity in the symptoms and manifestations of disease. I also raise questions about the account of natural kinds which Reznek utilizes and his point that conventions for classification are excluded by there being natural kinds.

Note: Article R Damico, Univ Florida, Dept Philosophy, 330 Griffin Floyd Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA

Keyword(s): disease; natural kind; value judgement; REALISM

Zurück | Weiter